Skip to main content

Review: In the Line of Fire - 1993

Story - Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan couldn't save Kennedy, but he's determined not to let a clever assassin take out this president.

Cast Clint Eastwood, John Malkovich, Rene Russo

Crew - Wolfgang Petersen (Director) Jeff Maguire (Writer)

Runtime - 128 minutes

         

Clint Eastwood, a man many remember for his Western characters in movies from the '60s portrays an aging secret service agent, trying to prevent the president's assassination. This movie is paced perfectly, time flies by. The suspense and the development of the story, trying to catch a rogue CIA agent played by John Malkovich is sublime. 

While watching this movie I was disappointed to think we probably won't get movies like this anymore, nowadays it feels like it's either big blockbuster movies or small indies, the mid-budget dramas are barely done these days if ever. 

Both actors give everything they have in this movie, having these back-and-forth arguments over the phone as if it were a dance, learning more about their personalities, past, and what they are probably thinking at the moment. Besides the action, some of the quiet moments really make everything sink into our consciousness, seeing how a beaten-down agent is trying his best to prevent another tragedy and to redeem himself from his previous mistakes.

It possesses some incredible shots and great direction by Wolfgang Petersen, it is the first movie I have seen of his, and I will try to watch more in the future.

In the Line of Fire is an engaging thriller, one that will leave you satisfied for the evening, one could call it a dad's movie but I think it is an everyone's movie. One that will trap you into a place of desperation, where doing the right thing can seem difficult or even impossible to accomplish, and to take a bullet if that means you can save another person's life.

         

Final Score -4.5/5

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: What is a Woman? - 2022

  Story  -   Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire travels around the world to ask one of the biggest questions of this generation. Cast  -  Matt Walsh Crew  -  Justin Folk (Director) Runtime   - 95  minutes           What is a woman? A woman is someone who claims that as their identity. After two years of the pandemic, many theater chains and venues are struggling to put people in their seats, it is harder than ever to get a group of 150–200 people to sit quietly and watch a drama, comedy, or even horror movie, surprisingly, one category of film that has seen a consistent demographic to show up are "conservative" or "right-wing" movies. This is not a new phenomenon, there have always been movies whose primary audiences were conservative, republican, and white throughout history, but this new era of filmmaking has been growing and gaining more attention after the release of the 2023 movie 'Sound of Freedom'. The supposed docum...

Review: Resan (The Journey) - 1987

  Story  -   Petter Watkins' global look at the impact of military use of nuclear technology and people's perception of it, as well as a meditation on the inherent bias of the media, and documentaries themselves. Cast  -  Peter Watkins Crew  -  Peter Watkins (Director) Runtime   - 873  minutes           "I think to remove the veil of ignorance from the world is the most direct way at least to achieve enlightenment." Sometimes it is incredibly difficult to sit and watch a long movie, after all, the way of life in the XXI century has been accelerating to the point that 90-minute movies are consumed in 20 different parts on a tiny screen while commuting to work. This is a world that 15 years ago I would have never imagined. I believe on this occasion, watching a movie divided into 19 different sections has helped me to appreciate and embrace what it is trying to say on a different level. It is hard for someone in 2024 to...

Look Back - Review

  Cast  - Yuumi Kawai, Mizuki Yoshida. Kiyotaka Oshiyama  - Director Tatsuki Fujimoto - Original Writer           "Then why do you draw, Fujino?"           ​​One of the most common complaints when watching a film is the runtime. When movies like Oppenheimer or Killers of the Flower Moon reach or surpass the 3-hour mark, it can be heavy to most viewers, but looking past the raw number of minutes it will take you to finish a movie this often rewards you with a much more intimate portrait of the characters, their mental states and why are they doing the things they do. This is not the norm, and many times the long runtime can feel clunky and unimportant. On the other side, we can get works like Look Back , that with a duration of 57 minutes fails to capture the essence of its two main characters and is more focused on giving us cute and emotional montages, trying to overcompensate the lack of character development. Look Ba...