Skip to main content

Review: Gilda - 1946

Story - A small-time gambler hired to work in a Buenos Aires casino discovers his employer's new wife is his former lover.

Cast - Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George Macready

Crew - Charles Vidor (Director), E.A. Ellington (Writer), Jo Eisinger (Writer), Marion Parsonnet (Writer)

Runtime - 110 minutes

         
Gilda, Are You Decent?

I have rarely seen a movie from the 40s this unapologetically horny. Gilda is an amazing character, the best thing from the movie, played by Rita Hayworth, she is a woman capable of getting what she wants by using her attractiveness. Making strong eye contact with men, making them nervous and confusing them, is so amazing. I want to compare her to Marilyn Monroe but I have only seen 2 movies with her on it.

Taking place in Argentina after WW2, it depicts perhaps some oddly specific things about the country, first the Tungsten cartels from which Gilda's husband Ballin Mudson -played by George Macready- is involved. Johnny Farrell -played by Glenn Ford- is helping Balling run a Casino, and that's when she reconnects with Gilda, where she tries to make him jealous by flirting with other men even when he is not his husband but just an old flame.

At 110 minutes Gilda offers us a funny noir movie, with some sexual paranoia between a trio of characters full of personality and background. Gorgeous set design and an incredible wardrobe is exhibited in this film, especially Gilda's satin sheet dress, which is perhaps one of the most iconic dresses in movie history and one that takes the spotlight even from Gilda herself.

         

Final Score - 4/5

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Resan (The Journey) - 1987

  Story  -   Petter Watkins' global look at the impact of military use of nuclear technology and people's perception of it, as well as a meditation on the inherent bias of the media, and documentaries themselves. Cast  -  Peter Watkins Crew  -  Peter Watkins (Director) Runtime   - 873  minutes           "I think to remove the veil of ignorance from the world is the most direct way at least to achieve enlightenment." Sometimes it is incredibly difficult to sit and watch a long movie, after all, the way of life in the XXI century has been accelerating to the point that 90-minute movies are consumed in 20 different parts on a tiny screen while commuting to work. This is a world that 15 years ago I would have never imagined. I believe on this occasion, watching a movie divided into 19 different sections has helped me to appreciate and embrace what it is trying to say on a different level. It is hard for someone in 2024 to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Opinion: Propaganda and "modern" Right-Wing ideas.

              "Will God Forgive Us?"           ​Have we taken for granted the power of propaganda films? We are almost 100 years removed from WW2 and the several communist revolutions that took place during the 20th century. I believe that during this period of time, when people from the past are starting to become impossible to relate to or to understand, we often dismiss their experiences and history as something foreign, from a less civilized time, it is easier to latch on to iconography and the images produced during that era. Propaganda movies are often victims of this simplification, and no country or society is more likely to have such results as Nazi Germany. Perhaps the biggest example of this is Triumph of the Will , in which filmmakers (and modern right-wing viewers) have distilled the 2-hour movie as a compilation of "based" content, where massive rallies, unification, standardization, and epic scenery are the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Look Back - Review

  Cast  - Yuumi Kawai, Mizuki Yoshida. Kiyotaka Oshiyama  - Director Tatsuki Fujimoto - Original Writer           "Then why do you draw, Fujino?"           ​​One of the most common complaints when watching a film is the runtime. When movies like Oppenheimer or Killers of the Flower Moon reach or surpass the 3-hour mark, it can be heavy to most viewers, but looking past the raw number of minutes it will take you to finish a movie this often rewards you with a much more intimate portrait of the characters, their mental states and why are they doing the things they do. This is not the norm, and many times the long runtime can feel clunky and unimportant. On the other side, we can get works like Look Back , that with a duration of 57 minutes fails to capture the essence of its two main characters and is more focused on giving us cute and emotional montages, trying to overcompensate the lack of character development. Look Ba...
Post a Comment
Read more